Dm. Cardo et al., VALIDATION OF SURGICAL WOUND CLASSIFICATION IN THE OPERATING-ROOM, Infection control and hospital epidemiology, 14(5), 1993, pp. 255-259
OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy with which circulating nurses (CN
s) classify surgical procedures by risk of contamination in the operat
ing room. DESIGN: Classification of surgical procedures by CNs was com
pared with the classification of surgical procedures by a physician ob
server. SETTING: University-affiliated, tertiary care hospital. METHOD
S: Circulating nurses used the traditional wound classification system
of clean, clean-contaminated, contaminated, and dirty-infected to cla
ssify surgical wounds in the operating room. A physician remained in t
he operating room throughout each of 100 surgical procedures and simul
taneously classified surgical wounds without the knowledge of the CNs.
RESULTS: Classification of surgical wounds by CNs was compared with c
lassification by the physician observer for 50 cases in general surger
y and 50 cases in trauma surgery. Compared with the physician observer
, the overall accuracy of classification by CNs was 88% (95% confidenc
e interval [CI] of 81.6% to 94.4%; Kappa statistic, 0.83). Classificat
ion of surgical wounds was more difficult in trauma surgery (accuracy
of 82%) than in general surgery (accuracy of 94%). Accuracy increased
for both services when surgical wounds were classified into just two c
ategories (clean or clean-contaminated versus contaminated or dirty-in
fected). CONCLUSIONS. Surgical wounds can be classified in the operati
ng room with a high degree of accuracy by CNs. Classification was more
difficult in trauma than in general surgery, but classification in tr
auma surgery improved with feedback to and additional education of CNs
. The accuracy of classification by CNs was even higher when classific
ations were divided into just two categories.