VARIABILITY OF ENERGY-METABOLISM AND NUCLEAR T-3-RECEPTORS WITHIN THESKELETAL-MUSCLE TISSUE OF PIGS DIFFERENT WITH RESPECT TO THE HALOTHANE GENE

Citation
R. Geers et al., VARIABILITY OF ENERGY-METABOLISM AND NUCLEAR T-3-RECEPTORS WITHIN THESKELETAL-MUSCLE TISSUE OF PIGS DIFFERENT WITH RESPECT TO THE HALOTHANE GENE, Journal of animal science, 74(4), 1996, pp. 717-722
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture Dairy & AnumalScience
Journal title
ISSN journal
00218812
Volume
74
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
717 - 722
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-8812(1996)74:4<717:VOEANT>2.0.ZU;2-Z
Abstract
Energy metabolism of skeletal muscle tissue of pigs growing from appro ximately 12 to 18 kg (12 homozygous halothane negative, HH; 16 heteroz ygotes, Hh; 17 homozygous halothane susceptible, hh) was measured in v ivo using P-31 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. Data for intracellular pH, phosphocreatine (PCr), phosphomonoesters (PME), and ATP were analyzed by canonical discriminant analysis, an artificial n eural network approach, and analysis of variance. Within the hh pigs, two subpopulations could be distinguished before the application of ha lothane treatment. Some of the hh pigs had a high PME concentration in the biceps femoris muscle (hh(pme+)), whereas others had a low concen tration (hh(pme-)) (2.18 +/- .12 for hh(pme+) vs 1.68 +/- .12 mM for h h(pme-), P <.004). The hh(pme+) pigs were statistically different from HH pigs for pH (P <.03), PME (P <.004), and PCr(P <.008) before halot hane treatment. The hh(pme-) pigs were not different from the Hh and H H pigs with respect to PME when measured before halothane treatment (P >.05). However, intracellular pH (P <.03) and PCr (P < .008) of the h h(pme-) pigs were different from those of KH pigs (7.15 vs 7.19 for pH and 38.7 vs 35.1 for PCr, respectively). When combining intracellular pH, PME, and PCr within a canonical discriminant analysis, all were m easured before halothane treatment, Hh pigs were found to be different from HH pigs (Mahalanobis distance different from zero, P <.02). In a second experiment, growth rate, depth of longissimus muscle, and maxi mal binding capacity of nuclear T-3-receptors of skeletal muscle tissu e were different (P <.05, P < .002, and P <.02, respectively) among pi gs selected from the same genetic lines. Of the variability in depth o f the longissimus muscle, 22% was explained by variability in maximal binding capacity of nuclear T-3-receptors. These results, if confirmed with a large number of pigs, might open new possibilities for selecti on procedures for leanness because, with respect to halothane suscepti bility, a shift between genotypic and phenotypic variability was obser ved.