EFFECT OF EXPOSURE VARIATION ON THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF CHEST RADIOGRAPHS

Citation
Rm. Slone et al., EFFECT OF EXPOSURE VARIATION ON THE CLINICAL UTILITY OF CHEST RADIOGRAPHS, Radiology, 199(2), 1996, pp. 497-504
Citations number
55
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
00338419
Volume
199
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
497 - 504
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-8419(1996)199:2<497:EOEVOT>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
PURPOSE: To study the effects of exposure error on the clinical utilit y of chest radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Under- and overexposed screen-film images were simulated by adding exposure offsets to the no rmalized CR log(10) exposure data from a computed radiography (CR) sys tem and printed by using the sensitometric response of a medium-latitu de system. The clinical utility of the overall image, lung, and soft t issue in 48 images were independently graded by eight radiologists. RE SULTS: Most variability in image scores was due to differences in expo sure. About 95% of the lung regions and 75% of the soft-tissue regions were rated as having good or ideal clinical utility at the nominal ex posure. About 80% of the overall images were rated as good or better f or exposures within 40% (0.15 log(10) exposure) of the nominal. The ov erall image scores were heavily influenced by the lung region, and rea der tolerance for exposure error was greater for soft tissue than for lung. The optimal exposure for soft tissue was about 60% (0.25 log(10) exposure) greater than for lung; therefore, no single exposure was op timal for the entire image. CONCLUSION: Conventional medium-latitude s creen-film systems have intrinsic limitations for capturing and displa ying the wide transmittance differences in the thorax. The clinical ut ility of chest radiographs may be improved by developing better image capture and display techniques.