Bg. Garber et al., ADULT-RESPIRATORY-DISTRESS-SYNDROME - A SYSTEMATIC OVERVIEW OF INCIDENCE AND RISK-FACTORS, Critical care medicine, 24(4), 1996, pp. 687-695
Objective: To determine the published incidence of adult respiratory d
istress syndrome (ARDS) as well as the clinical evidence supporting a
causal association between ARDS and its major risk factors. Data Sourc
es: The National Library of Medicine MEDLINE database and the bibliogr
aphies of selected articles. Study Selection: Clinical studies were se
lected from the English literature, if they pertained to either the in
cidence of ARDS or its association with one or more commonly identifie
d risk factors. Data Extraction: All relevant studies identified by th
e search were evaluated for strength of design, and risk factors were
scored according to established criteria for the strength of causation
. Data Synthesis: A total of 83 articles were considered relevant: six
on incidence and 77 on risk factors, Only 49% of the 83 articles prov
ided a definition of ARDS; a definition of risk factors was given in 6
4%, and 23% had no definition for either ARDS or risk factors,The publ
ished, population-based incidence of ARDS ranges from 1.5 to 5.3/10(5)
population/yr. The strongest clinical evidence supporting a cause-eff
ect relationship was identified for sepsis, aspiration, trauma, and mu
ltiple transfusions. The weakest clinical evidence was identified for
disseminated intravascular coagulation, The following study types were
represented by the 77 articles on risk factors: observational case-se
ries (56%); cohorts (23%); case-controls (12%); nonrandomized clinical
trials (5%); and randomized clinical trials (3%), Only a single study
reported an odds ratio. Conclusions: The significant variation in the
incidence of ARDS is attributed to differences in the type and streng
th of study designs, as well as definitions of ARDS, While a substanti
al body of evidence exists concerning a causal role for ARDS risk fact
ors, such as sepsis, aspiration, and trauma, >60% of clinical studies
employed weak designs, The lack of reproducible definitions for ARDS o
r its potential risk factors in 49% of studies raises concerns about t
he validity of the conclusions of these studies regarding the associat
ion between ARDS and the supposed risk factors.