Sk. Vaswani et Wk. Clarkston, ENDOSCOPIC NASOENTERAL FEEDING TUBE PLACEMENT FOLLOWING CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, The American surgeon, 62(5), 1996, pp. 421-423
Our purpose was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nasoenteral fee
ding tube placement in cardiothoracic surgery patients. This is a retr
ospective analysis of 15 critically ill cardiothoracic surgery patient
s who underwent endoscopic placement of an enteral feeding tube beyond
the proximal duodenum for maintenance of nutrition. Twenty-five entri
flex 10-F nasoenteral tubes were placed endoscopically using a modifie
d technique far into the distal duodenum, and the placement was confir
med radiographically. Mean patient age was 71 years. Seven were males
and 8 females. Eleven had undergone coronary artery bypass surgery, tw
o aortic valve replacement, and two aortic aneurysm repair. The mean d
uration of tube function was 8.5 days and mean duration of tube feedin
g was 15.7 days. Of the total 15 patients, 7 required replacement due
to various reasons, the most common being self extubation by the patie
nt and malpositioning after initial placement. No cardiac complication
s or any other complications were noted directly related to the endosc
opic procedure. In eight patients, the mean serum albumin level did no
t change [before: 2.5mg/dL, after: 2.6mg/dL] for the short time (avg.
8.5 days) the tube was functional. Conclusions: 1) Endoscopic placemen
t of the nasoenteral tubes is a safe method of providing enteral nutri
tion in critically ill cardiothoracic. surgery patients. 2) Benefits o
f nasoenteral tubes compared to nasogastric tubes remain unproven, and
frequent repositioning of nasoenteral tubes is required. 3) A prospec
tive comparison of nasoenteral and nasogastric tubes is warranted.