M. Carrier et al., CLINICAL-TRIAL OF RETROGRADE WARM BLOOD REPERFUSION VERSUS STANDARD COLD TOPICAL IRRIGATION OF TRANSPLANTED HEARTS, The Annals of thoracic surgery, 61(5), 1996, pp. 1310-1314
Background. A prospective, randomized clinical study involving 34 pati
ents undergoing heart transplantation compared myocardial preservation
of donor hearts maintained with continuous reperfusion with retrograd
e warm blood cardioplegia during surgical implantation versus the stan
dard cold topical irrigation. Methods. Hearts in both groups were arre
sted with a standard crystalloid solution and maintained in a cold sal
ine solution during transportation. In the retrograde group, cardiople
gia was administered through a catheter in the coronary sinus during s
urgical implantation. An average of 471 +/- 30 mL of hyperkalemic crys
talloid solution diluted 1:4 in warm blood from the oxygenator was inf
used. In the standard group, the heart was kept cold by topical irriga
tion of cold saline solution and was reperfused only when the ascendin
g aorta clamped.Results. Preoperative characteristics of donors and re
cipients were similar in the two cohorts. Ischemic time averaged 139 /- 12 minutes in the retrograde group compared with 130 +/- 11 minutes
in the standard group (p = 0.57). Cardiopulmonary bypass time average
d 89 +/- 4 minutes in the retrograde group and 110 +/- 12 minutes in t
he standard group (p = 0.12). Defibrillation at reperfusion was perfor
med in 4 patients (4/17, 24%) in the retrograde group and 12 patients
(12/18, 67%) in the standard group (p = 0.01). There were no deaths in
the retrograde group (0/17), whereas in the standard group, 3 patient
s (3/17) died of early graft failure (p = 0.11). Four early graft fail
ures occurred in the standard group (p = 0.06). Two patients (2/17, 12
%) were weaned from bypass with ventricular assist devices in the stan
dard group. The number of subendocardial necrotic cells in the first t
wo weekly endomyocardial biopsy specimens averaged 2.7 +/- 0.8 cells/m
m(2) in the retrograde group and 5.9 +/- 2.4 cells/mm(2) in the standa
rd group (p = 0.12). Conclusions. Retrograde warm blood reperfusion ap
pears to improve the initial recovery of transplanted hearts. The tech
nique is easy to use and may be a useful approach to graft protection
during surgical implantation.