N. Wang et S. Lane, DETECTION OF GENDER-RELATED DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING IN A MATHEMATICS PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT, Applied measurement in education, 9(2), 1996, pp. 175-199
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Educational","Psychologym Experimental","Education & Educational Research
This study used three different differential item functioning (DIF) de
tection procedures to examine the extent to which items in a mathemati
cs performance assessment functioned differently for matched gender gr
oups. In addition to examining the appropriateness of individual items
in terms of DIF with respect to gender, an attempt was made to identi
fy factors (e.g., content, cognitive processes, differences in ability
distributions, etc.) that may be related to DIF. The QUASAR (Quantita
tive Understanding: Amplifying Student Achievement and Reasoning) Cogn
itive Assessment Instrument (QCAI) is designed to measure students' ma
thematical thinking and reasoning skills and consists of open-ended it
ems that require students to show their solution processes and provide
explanations for their answers. In this study, 33 polytomously scored
items, which were distributed within four test forms, were evaluated
with respect to gender-related DIF. The data source was sixth- and sev
enth-grade student responses to each of the four test forms administra
ted in the spring of 1992 at all six school sites participating in the
QUASAR project. The sample consisted of 1,782 students with approxima
tely equal numbers of female and male students. The results indicated
that DIF may not be serious for 31 of the 33 items (94%) in the QCAI.
For the two items that were detected as functioning differently for ma
le and female students, several plausible factors for DIF were discuss
ed. The results from the secondary analyses, which removed the mutual
influence of the two items, indicated that DIF in one item, PPP1, whic
h favored female students rather than their matched male students, was
of particular concern. These secondary analyses suggest that the dete
ction of DIF in the other item in the original analysis may have been
due to the influence of Item PPP1 because they were both in the same t
est form.