Mj. Werner et al., CONCURRENT AND PROSPECTIVE SCREENING FOR PROBLEM DRINKING AMONG COLLEGE-STUDENTS, Journal of adolescent health, 18(4), 1996, pp. 276-285
Purpose: Previous studies suggest that combining the CAGE questionnair
e with the Perceived Benefit of Drinking Scale (PBDS), information abo
ut an adolescent's use of tobacco, and best friend's drinking pattern
is a useful composite screening measure for problem drinking. The pres
ent study was undertaken to evaluate this composite screening measure
prospectively as a predictor of subsequent problem drinking among late
adolescents across 3 years of college. Methods: A random sample of 45
2 college freshmen entered a longitudinal study of alcohol use at the
beginning of their freshman year. A total of 184 (58%) completed follo
w-up measures of alcohol use 32 months later. Outcome measures include
d the quantity and frequency of alcohol use and a composite measure of
specific alcohol-related problems. Results: CAGE scores, PBDS scores,
tobacco use, and best friend's drinking patterns as reported at colle
ge entry together explained 33% of the variance in the quantity/freque
ncy measure and 37% of the variance in the alcohol-related problems me
asure from the end of the junior year. These same variables as reporte
d at the end of the junior year explained 50% of the variance in the q
uantity/frequency measure and 61% of the variance in the alcohol-relat
ed problems measure. The composite screening measure as reported at co
llege entry had a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 70%, positive pre
dictive value (PPV) of 63%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 78%
for students at high risk for problem drinking at the end of the juni
or year. A similar concurrent composite screening measure consisting o
f the same variables reported at the end of the junior year had a sens
itivity of 88%, specificity of 56%, PPV of 60%, and NPV of 83% for hig
h-risk drinkers. A total of 70-73% of students could be correctly cate
gorized by each composite screening measure. These composite screening
tests had significantly better test characteristics than the CAGE or
PBDS alone. Conclusions: College students' responses to the CAGE, PBDS
, tobacco use, and their friends' drinking remain consistent over 3 ye
ars and correlate with concurrent and future risk for problem drinking
. These variables explain significant variance in drinking and alcohol
-related problems and may constitute a useful screening measure for cu
rrent and future problem drinking.