Statistical measures are needed to reveal at a glance how far (or near
) various countries are to meeting the conditions of long-run sustaina
bility, and how conditions are changing on a year-to-year basis (i.e.,
whether sustainability is being approached or not). The scheme propos
ed in this paper presents numerical comparisons of energy and material
s use in the real world vis a vis an ideal case where all of the ident
ifiable criteria for sustainability are satisfied. Apart from populati
on stabilization, five general but quantifiable criteria for sustainab
ility are suggested, including (1) stabilization of greenhouse gas con
centrations in the atmosphere, (2) stabilization of acidity (pH) in ra
infall, (3) reduction of dissipative uses, and wastes, of heavy metals
to natural mobilization rates, or lower, (4) elimination of agricultu
re based on pumping ''fossil'' water from non-renewable aquifers and (
5) elimination of loss of arable land because of salination or erosion
. Other criteria, such as preservation of biodiversity and socio-econo
mic equity between countries and generations might be added to the lis
t. They introduce more difficult measurement problems, however, which
are not considered further in the paper. Having fixed the list of crit
eria, the next step is to identify measures that either go to zero or
unity, as the system approaches more and more closely to sustainabilit
y, at least in the limited sense defined above. Various types of measu
res of sustainability/unsustainability can be developed, viz. (i) meas
ures of relative dependence of the economy on non-renewable sources of
energy and materials, (ii) measures of the productivity of energy and
materials consumed by the economic system and (iii) measures of dissi
pative loss, especially of toxic and hazardous substances. Specific ex
amples of each type are discussed.