Jd. Sun et al., IN-VITRO SKIN PENETRATION OF MONOETHANOLAMINE AND DIETHANOLAMINE USING EXCISED SKIN FROM RATS, MICE, RABBITS, AND HUMANS, Journal of toxicology. Cutaneous and ocular toxicology, 15(2), 1996, pp. 131-146
Monoethanolamine (MEA; CAS No. 141-43-5) and diethanolamine (DEA; CAS
No. 111-42-2) are used in a number of cosmetic formulations. Therefore
, dermal absorption is an important route of potential human exposure
to these compounds. Because of this, the skin penetration characterist
ics of these two alkanolamines were evaluated using an established in
vitro technique. Full-thickness skin preparations from female CD rats,
CD-1 mice, New Zealand White rabbits, and female mammoplasty patients
were used. Using a dynamic, flow-through design, skin penetration app
aratus, undiluted and aqueous solutions of [C-14]MEA and [C-14]DEA wer
e applied to skin preparations from each species in an ''infinite dose
'' manner at target doses of 4 mg/cm(2) and 20 mg/cm(2), respectively.
The time course of C-14 penetration was then measured for 6 h. The re
sults showed that undiluted MEA penetrated animal skin better than did
undiluted DEA, but was approximately the same for human skin. For the
aqueous applications of MEA and DEA, the penetration was similar to e
ach species, except for rabbit skin, in which the permeability appeare
d to be less for aqueous MEA than it was for aqueous DEA. Comparing un
diluted and water diluted doses of each compound, the results showed t
hat there was generally less skin penetration of the undiluted materia
l than that for the diluted test substances. Therefore, the total abso
rbed dose of MEA or DEA would be less for cutaneous exposures to undil
uted MEA or DEA as compared to similar exposures to water solutions of
either compound. A comparison of permeability constants among the spe
cies tested suggests that the general rank order of skin penetration f
or both chemicals, undiluted or diluted, as mouse > rabbit > rat > hum
an skin. Therefore, the results from this in vitro study suggest that
the potential percutaneous absorption of MEA or DEA would be less for
humans than it would be for rats, rabbits, and mice.