The establishment of health-protective soil remediation levels often r
elies on the results of a risk assessment, which provides a way to equ
ate a permissible risk to a target soil contaminant concentration. Inh
erent in such risk assessments is the assumption that the target conce
ntrations are representative averages. Unfortunately, soil cleanup lev
els thus calculated are typically misapplied on a point by point basis
rather than on an average. This is not cost-effective because it resu
lts in post-remedy conditions that overshoot the target risk goals. Be
cause environmental contamination is characterized by a distribution o
f concentrations, some exceedances of target averages, average risk, o
r average concentration can be allowed in the post-remediation distrib
ution. This work presents a mathematical model for calculating this al
lowable higher than average concentration, termed the confidence respo
nse goal (CRG), which places a limit on concentrations requiring remed
iation while ensuring that target average concentrations are satisfied
overall. The CRG is site-specific becauses it depends on the contamin
ant concentration distribution. The strength of the approach lies in i
ts ability to handle typical data uncertainties quantitatively because
it relies on the upper confidence limit as a measure of the mean conc
entration (in a manner similar to its use in risk assessment), hence t
he term ''confidence'' in the CRG. The advantages of the approach are
significant. An example is given of a Superfund site where excavation
volumes were reduced by 66% and $40 million was saved, about half of w
hich could be attributed to the CRG approach.