A. Rieger et al., A COMPARISON OF SEVOFLURANE WITH HALOTHANE IN OUTPATIENT ADENOTOMY INCHILDREN WITH MILD UPPER RESPIRATORY-TRACT INFECTIONS, Journal of clinical anesthesia, 8(3), 1996, pp. 188-193
Study Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of sevoflurane
compared with halothane in pediatric outpatient ear-nose-throat (ENT)
surgery during the induction, maintenance emergence, and recovery of
anesthesia. Design: Prospective, randomized, comparative, open-label s
tudy. Setting: ENT operating room and postoperative recovery room at a
university medical center. Patients: 41 ASA status I and II children
between the ages of 2 to 10 years, with mild upper respiratory tract i
nfection (URI). Interventions: Induction and maintenance of anesthesia
with either sevoflurane or halothane for outpatient adenotomy, otomic
roscopy, and myringotomy. Measurements and Main Results: Induction (me
an +/- SEM) was significantly shorter the sevoflurane group (2.6 +/- 0
.2 minutes) than in the halothane group (3.2 +/- 0.2 minutes). There w
as no difference between the two groups with regard to complications t
hat occurred during the induction and maintenance period. The time to
emergence and recovery was significantly shorter with sevoflurane than
with halothane (means +/- SEM; time to extubation 9.9 +/- 0.98 minute
s vs. 13.4 +/- 1.06 minutes, time to eye opening 12.9 +/- 1.6 minutes
vs. 24.5 +/- 1.8 minutes, command response time 20.7 +/- 2.5 minutes v
s. 36.4 +/- 2.8 minutes). No difference in the incidence of complicati
ons during emergence and recovery was found. Evaluation of recovery as
assessed by a modified Aldrete score showed that children who had rec
eived sevoflurane reached higher scores in the first 30 minutes follow
ing the discontinuation of the anesthetic. The Pain/Discomfort Scale d
emonstrated a difference in the sevoflurane group, with more children
being agitated and restless. Conclusion: Sevoflurane provides a safe a
nd rapid anesthetic induction with no differences in complications dur
ing the induction, maintenance, and emergence period. With sevoflurane
, the time of emergence and recovery was significantly shorter. The ch
aracteristics of sevoflurane as evaluated in the present study make it
a suitable anesthetic in pediatric outpatient surgery even in the pre
sence of mile URI.