INFLUENCE OF FRACTIONATION AND FLUENCE RATE IN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WITH PHOTOFRIN OR MTHPC

Citation
Ipj. Vangeel et al., INFLUENCE OF FRACTIONATION AND FLUENCE RATE IN PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY WITH PHOTOFRIN OR MTHPC, Radiation research, 145(5), 1996, pp. 602-609
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology,Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
Journal title
ISSN journal
00337587
Volume
145
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
602 - 609
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-7587(1996)145:5<602:IOFAFR>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Various schedules of fractionated photodynamic therapy (PDT), delivere d at two different light fluence rates, were investigated in the RIF1 tumor model in an attempt to minimize the development of hypoxia durin g PDT and thereby improve tumor response relative to single treatments . The photosensitizers Photofrin and meta-tetrahydroxyphenylchlorin (m THPC) were used in combination with either interstitial or superficial illumination. For both methods of illumination, equal volumetric ligh t doses gave similar tumor responses, as measured by tumor regrowth ti mes and number of cures. Fractionation of superficial illumination did not generally improve tumor response compared with a single illuminat ion with the same total light dose. The only fractionated schedules wh ich demonstrated a trend for increased cure were six fractions of supe rficial illumination given with short (1 h) dark periods between illum inations. Using both photosensitizers, an increase in tumor regrowth t ime occurred when tumors were illuminated interstitially with continuo us light at a linear diffuser output of 50 mW compared with 100 mW per cm diffuser length. Discontinuous illumination with alternating light and dark periods of 30 s improved the tumor response further for mTHP C-mediated PDT at a fluence rate of 100 mW cm(-1). No improvement in r esponse was seen by discontinuous interstitial illumination after Phot ofrin-mediated PDT. These results demonstrate that lower fluence rates and/or fractionating the light dose delivered can improve the respons e of the RIF1 tumor to PDT but that the choice of dark intervals betwe en fractions is critical. (C) 1996 by Radiation Research Society