Mr. Valetto et al., REPRODUCIBILITY OF THE GROWTH-HORMONE RESPONSE TO STIMULATION WITH GROWTH HORMONE-RELEASING HORMONE PLUS ARGININE DURING LIFE-SPAN, European journal of endocrinology, 135(5), 1996, pp. 568-572
The reliability and reproducibility of provocative stimuli of growth h
ormone (GH) secretion in the diagnosis of GH deficiency are still cont
roversial both in childhood and in adulthood, The combined administrat
ion of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and arginine (ARG), which likely ac
ts via inhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin release, is one of the
most potent stimuli known so far and has been proposed recently as the
best test to explore the maximal somatotrope capacity of somatotrope
cells, However, it is well known that, usually, provocative stimuli of
GH secretion suffer from poor reproducibility and that of the GHRH ARG test has still to be verified. We aimed to verify the between- and
within-subject variability of the GH response to the GHRH + ARG test
in normal subjects during their lifespan as well as in hypopituitaric
patients with GH deficiency (GHD), In 10 normal children (C: six male
and four female, age 12.3 +/- 0.9 years, body mass index (BMI) = 16.6
+/- 0.7 kg/m(2), pubertal stages I-III), 18 normal young adults (Y: te
n male and eight female, age 31.1 +/- 1.3 years, BMI = 21.4 +/- 0.4 kg
/m(2)), 12 normal elderly subjects (E: two male and ten female, age 74
.4 +/- 1.8 years, BMI = 22.6 +/- 0.6 kg/m(2)) and 15 panhypopituitaric
GH-deficient patients (GHD: nine male and six female, age 40.9 +/- 4.
1 years, BMI = 22.7 +/- 1.0 kg/m(2)), we studied the inter- and intra-
individual variability of the GH response to GHRH (1 mu g/kg iv) + ARG
(0.5 g/kg iv) in two different sessions at least 3 days apart. The GH
responses to GHRH + ARG in C (1st vs 2nd session: 61.6 +/- 8.1 vs 66.
5 +/- 9.4 mu g/l), Y (70.4 +/- 10.1 vs 76.2 +/- 10.7 mu g/l) and E (57
.9 +/- 14.8 vs 52.1 +/- 8.0 mu g/l) were similar and reproducible in a
ll groups, The somatotrope responsiveness to GHRH + ARG also showed a
limited within-subject variability (r = 0.71, 0.90 and 0.89 and p < 0.
02, 0.0005 and 0.0005 for C, Y and E, respectively), Similarly in GHD,
the GH response to the GHRH+ARG test showed a good inter- (1st vs 2nd
session: 2.3 +/- 0.5 vs 2.2 +/- 0.6 mu g/l) and intraindividual repro
ducibility (r = 0.70, p < 0.005), The GHRH + ARG-induced GH responses
in GHD were markedly lower (p < 0.0005) than those in age-matched cont
rols and no overlap was found between GH peak responses in GHD and nor
mal subjects. In normal subjects, the GH response to GHRH + ARG is ver
y marked, independent of age and shows limited inter- and intra-indivi
dual variability. The GH response to the GHRH + ARG test is strikingly
reduced in panhypopituitaric patients with GHD, in whom the low somat
otrope responsiveness is reproducible. Thus, these findings strengthen
the hypothesis that GHRH + ARG should be considered the most reliable
test to evaluate the maximal secretory capacity of somatotrope cells
and to distinguish normal subjects from GHD patients in adulthood.