Gd. Pollak, SOME COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED PERCEPTION OF PHASE AND NANOSECOND TIMEDISPARITIES BY ECHOLOCATING BATS, Journal of comparative physiology. A, Sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 172(5), 1993, pp. 523-531
In a series of recent reports, Simmons and his colleagues propose that
bats are able to accurately encode the spectral, temporal and phase i
nformation of their emitted calls and echoes. The information so encod
ed is then extracted by the networks of the auditory system with speci
alized processing. They propose that bats use this information to dete
rmine the distance to their target by crosscorrelating the entire stru
cture of the emitted call with the structure of the echo. The idea is
that slight deviations in the correlation function can be detected by
the bat and the degree of mismatch provides an accurate measure of tem
poral disparity and hence range. The data in the reports purport to sh
ow that bats perceive the phase of ultrasonic signals and that they ca
n resolve temporal disparities of about 10 ns, and thus can distinguis
h range differences as small as 2 mum. The hypothesis also attempts to
explain how a variety of acoustic cues are processed and represented
in the auditory system and how they are combined to form a unitary per
cept of space and fine structure. The theory incorporates some time ho
nored processes of extracting information, such as crosscorrelations.
The implications of. the hypothesis, however, go far beyond a theory o
f neural processing and representation of information by ensembles of
cells. The hypothesis requires some remarkable abilities, such as the
phase coding of ultrasonic signals and a temporal acuity on the order
of 10 ns. These features have never been seen in any neurophysiologica
l study of any animal nor has its existence been implied in behavioral
studies of other animals. If bats, in fact, detect and process those
signals in the manner proposed by Simmons and his colleagues, it would
suggest that bats are supermammals whose auditory systems have evolve
d new and extraordinary mechanisms not possessed by other animals. In
view of the extraordinary implications of the hypothesis, it seems pru
dent to critically evaluate the data upon which the hypothesis is base
d. The purpose of this review is to point out a number of technical pr
oblems and deficiencies in those experiments which undermine the verac
ity of the purported demonstration of phase perception and nanosecond
time resolution by bats.