Land suitability assesses the potential of land for a specific land us
e. Traditionally, interactions between land characteristics and produc
tivity are determined using qualitative methods. In contrast, a quanti
tative land evaluation uses a biophysical model to estimate these inte
ractions. This paper presents a comparison between a qualitative and q
uantitative evaluation. Spatial coverages of soil, climate and topogra
phy were compiled for approximately 2850 km(2) of a dryland cereal cro
pping area in central Queensland, Australia. Model parameters that des
cribe the soil were derived from soil survey data using surrogate meth
ods. That is, no model calibration was used. The comparison of land su
itability class and modelled yield showed that spatial modelling expla
ined up to 80% of the variability in land suitability class. The resul
ts in this paper have provided confidence in the use of modelling tech
niques for land evaluation in Queensland, Australia.