T. Widrich et al., COMPARISON OF SALINE INFUSION SONOGRAPHY WITH OFFICE HYSTEROSCOPY FORTHE EVALUATION OF THE ENDOMETRIUM, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 174(4), 1996, pp. 1327-1334
OBJECTIVE: Intrauterine infusion of saline solution during transvagina
l ultrasonography enhances visualization of the endometrium. We compar
ed the accuracy and pain rating of saline infusion sonography with tho
se of flexible office hysteroscopy. STUDY DESIGN: The uterine cavities
of 130 patients with abnormal bleeding were evaluated by two physicia
ns in an office setting. Findings of endometrial polyps, submucous myo
mas, synechiae, endometrial hyperplasia, or cancer were recorded indep
endently and subsequently compared. Patients rated their pain after ea
ch procedure. RESULTS: Both procedures were performed in 113 of 130 pa
tients. With saline infusion sonography pathologic findings were ident
ified in 61 patients (54%). For all findings combined, sensitivity was
0.96 and specificity was 0.88, compared with hysteroscopy. The result
s of saline infusion sonography and hysteroscopy did not differ signif
icantly (p = 0.18). The former was less painful for patients than hyst
eroscopy (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Saline infusion sonography is an ac
curate and well-tolerated method to evaluate abnormal uterine bleeding
, compared with hysteroscopy.