B. Croisile et al., COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF ORAL AND WRITTEN PICTURE DESCRIPTION IN PATIENTSWITH ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE, Brain and language, 53(1), 1996, pp. 1-19
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Language & Linguistics","Psychology, Experimental",Neurosciences
Oral and written picture descriptions were compared in 22 patients wit
h Alzheimer's disease (AD) and 24 healthy elderly subjects. AD patient
s had a significant reduction of all word categories, which, similarly
to controls, was more pronounced in written than in oral texts. They
also reported fewer information units than controls, but without task
difference. At the syntactic level, written descriptions of AD subject
s were characterized by a diminution of subordinate clauses and a redu
ction of functors. More grammatical errors were present in written des
criptions by AD and control subjects. AD and control groups produced a
n equivalent number of semantic errors in both tasks. However, in oral
description, AD patients had more word-finding difficulties. In sum,
AD descriptions were always shorter and less informative than control
texts. Additionally, written descriptions of AD patients appeared shor
ter and more syntactically simplified than, but as informative as, ora
l descriptions. Whereas no phonemic paraphasias were observed in eithe
r group, AD patients produced many more graphemic paragraphias than co
ntrols produced. Furthermore, written descriptions had more irrelevant
semantic intrusions. Thus, as compared to oral descriptions, written
texts appeared to be a more reliable test of semantic and linguistics
difficulties in AD. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.