Most turtle species suffer high mortality in their first year, have a
long juvenile period, and can live for decades once they reach adultho
od. Conservationists have implemented a number of recovery plans for t
hreatened turtle populations, including experimental ''headstart'' pro
grams. Headstarting involves the captive rearing of hatchlings from eg
gs collected in the wild. The hatchlings are held for several months t
o help them avoid high mortality in their first year. It is hoped that
these turtles survive and grow like wild turtles after release. The p
urpose of our study was to evaluate headstarting as a management tool
for threatened turtle populations. We critically examined the populati
on-level effects of headstarting with a series of deterministic matrix
models for yellow mud turtles (Kinosternon flavescens), a ''non-threa
tened,'' well-studied species, and endangered Kemp's ridley sea turtle
s (Lepidochelys kempi). We show that management efforts focused exclus
ively on improving survival in the first year of life are unlikely to
be effective for long-lived species such as turtles. Population projec
tions for both turtles predict that headstarting can augment increasin
g populations when adult survival is returned to or maintained at high
levels, provided that headstarted juveniles are as vigorous as wild t
urtles. However, when subadult and adult survival is reduced, headstar
ting cannot compensate for losses in later stages. Proportional sensit
ivity (elasticity) analyses of stage-based matrix models indicated tha
t annual survival rates for subadult and adult turtles are most critic
al; small decreases in the survival of older turtles can quickly overc
ome any potential benefits of headstarting. In general, the biological
benefits of headstarting programs may be overestimated for turtles, a
nd a careful examination of stage-specific mortality sources, demograp
hy, and life history can guide us toward more effective management str
ategies.