P. Pibarot et al., THE EFFECT OF PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH ON AORTIC BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE HEMODYNAMIC PERFORMANCE AND PATIENT CLINICAL STATUS, Canadian journal of cardiology, 12(4), 1996, pp. 379-387
BACKGROUND: High pressure gradients occurring through normally functio
ning prosthetic valves appear to be related to a mismatch between the
effective orifice area of the prosthesis and the patient's body surfac
e area. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prosthesis-patient mismatch af
fects clinical and hemodynamic status, a group of patients with a biop
rosthetic heart valve in the aortic position was prospectively evaluat
ed at 6.2+/-4.4 years at implantation by transthoracic Doppler echocar
diography. METHODS: Manufacturer-derived in vitro valve areas were ava
ilable in 61 patients allowing classification into two subgroups, with
or without mismatch, based on a valve area at implantation indexed fr
o body surface area 0.85 cm(2)/m(2) or less, or greater than 0.85 cm(2
)/m(2). Clinical and hemodynamic parameters evaluated at follow-up inc
luded New York Heart Association (NYHA) class distribution, mean trans
prosthetic gradient, prosthetic valve area and cardiac index. RESULTS:
Prosthesis-patient mismatch was present in 32 of 61 patients (52%). A
lthough NYHA class of the patients was similar in both groups, hemodyn
amic performance of the aortic bioprostheses was worse in patients wit
h mismatch than in patients with no mismatch, as indicated by a higher
mean gradient (22+/-9 versus 15+/-8 mmHg, P=0.002) and a lower cardia
c index (3.0+/-0.7 versus 3.4+/-0.7 L/min/m(2), P=0.04). The prevalenc
e and severity of intrinsic prosthetic dysfunction were similar in bot
h groups. Despite similar NYHA functional class distribution in both g
roups, the occurrence of syncope, acute pulmonary edema and angina pec
toris was significantly higher in patients with mismatch (50% versus 2
1%, P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: Prosthesis-patient mismatch is associated w
ith worse hemodynamic performance and higher prevalence of adverse cli
nical events. However, mismatch did not promote accelerated hemodynami
c or structural deterioration of the bioprosthesis.