ALTERNATIVE BASE CASES IN PHOTOCHEMICAL MODELING - THEIR CONSTRUCTION, ROLE, AND VALUE

Citation
S. Reynolds et al., ALTERNATIVE BASE CASES IN PHOTOCHEMICAL MODELING - THEIR CONSTRUCTION, ROLE, AND VALUE, Atmospheric environment, 30(12), 1996, pp. 1977-1988
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Environmental Sciences","Metereology & Atmospheric Sciences
Journal title
ISSN journal
13522310
Volume
30
Issue
12
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1977 - 1988
Database
ISI
SICI code
1352-2310(1996)30:12<1977:ABCIPM>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
This study assesses the potential influence compensating errors in pho tochemical model inputs may have on estimates of the effects of emissi on control scenarios. Motivation stems from the apparent ability to ac hieve satisfactory model performance despite evidence suggesting the e xistence of significant biases in emissions estimates. Urban Airshed M odel (UAM) sensitivity studies were carried out using simulations of t wo summer 1987 O-3 episodes in the South Coast Air Basin of California . Since existing simulations exhibited inadequate performance, efforts were made to rectify these problems. Plausible conditions that might define acceptable base cases were established and model runs were made to determine which alternative base cases provided a level of UAM per formance comparable to the best achieved for the two summer episodes. The alternative base cases produced different estimates of the air qua lity benefits associated with hypothetical emission control scenarios. For example, one set of base cases indicated that NOx controls would be counterproductive in helping to reduce the estimated peak O-3 conce ntration in the eastern portion of the modeling domain. Another base c ase suggested that such controls would yield almost no change in the p eak value. The results from alternative base case simulations provide a lower bound estimate of the uncertainty that attends future year mod eling results. Such analyses should be incorporated into current photo chemical modeling practice. Copyright (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd