J. Kekoni et al., IS THE SOMATOSENSORY N250 RELATED TO DEVIANCE DISCRIMINATION OR CONSCIOUS TARGET DETECTION, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Evoked potentials, 100(2), 1996, pp. 115-125
Effects of attention to, and probability of sudden changes in, repetit
ive stimuli on somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) were studied. Low
- (30 Hz) and high-frequency (140 Hz) vibratory stimuli were delivered
in random order to the middle finger of the left hand with different
presentation probabilities in different blocks. Also ignore conditions
were administered. In the ignore conditions, the probability had no e
ffect on SEPs. However, when the standard stimuli were omitted, the ''
deviants'' elicited small N140 and P300 deflections not observed in re
sponse to deviants when standards were also present. In the attention
conditions, deviant stimuli (targets) elicited large N250 and P300 def
lections which increased in amplitude with a decreased target probabil
ity. However, when subjects counted infrequently presented ''deviants'
' alone (standards omitted) the enhanced N140 and the P300 with shorte
ned latency were elicited, but no N250 wave could be found. At the ips
ilateral side, a distinct N200 deflection was seen which could be the
N250 with a shorter latency because of an easier task (detection inste
ad of discrimination). The results might be interpreted as suggesting
that the somatosensory N250 is related to conscious detection of targe
t stimuli.