Various criteria used to define atypical antipsychotic drugs include:
1) decrease, or absence, of the capacity to cause acute extrapyramidal
motor side effects (acute EPSE) and tardive dyskinesia (TD); 2) incre
ased therapeutic efficacy reflected by improvement in positive, negati
ve, or cognitive symptoms; 3) and a decrease, or absence. of the capac
ity to increase prolactin levels. The pharmacologic basis of atypical
antipsychotic drug activity has been the target of intensive study sin
ce the significance of clozapine was first appreciated. Three notions
have been utilized conceptually to explain the distinction between aty
pical versus typical antipsychotic drugs: 1) dose-response separation
between particular pharmacologic functions; 2) anatomic specificity of
particular pharmacologic activities; 3) neurotransmitter receptor int
eractions and pharmacodynamics. These conceptual bases are not mutuall
y exclusive, and the demonstration of limbic versus extrapyramidal mot
or functional selectivity is apparent within each arbitrary theoretica
l base. This review discusses salient distinctions predominantly betwe
en prototypic atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs such as clozapi
ne and haloperidol, respectively. In addition, areas of common functio
n between atypical and typical antipsychotic drug action may also be c
rucial to our identification of pathophysiological foci of the differe
nt dimensions of schizophrenia, including positive symptoms, negative
symptoms, and neurocognitive deficits.