Hydrology and the other environmental sciences need to re-evaluate the
ir approach to the scientific study of the problems with which they de
al; there is a fundamental conflict between the scale of experiments a
nd the scale of problems of significance. This conflict will not be re
solved in hydrology with the range of measurement techniques that are
currently available and, for good reasons, cannot be solved by theoret
ical reasoning alone. An interim approach is advocated, in which hypot
heses to be tested and predictive models are formulated from a disaggr
egation point of view, rather than the futile attempts at aggregation
represented by most of today's 'physically-based' theorising. Such an
approach must recognise explicitly the equifinality and uncertainty th
at will accompany the limitations of disaggregation from a larger scal
e, but can, in fact, use uncertainty as a tool in working towards more
realistic theory, as and when new data and measurement techniques bec
ome available.