The results are reported of comparisons based on energy and exergy ana
lyses of a wide range of hydrogen production processes, including proc
esses which are hydrocarbon-based (steam-methane reforming and coal ga
sification), non-hydrocarbon-based (water electrolysis and thermochemi
cal water decomposition) and integrated (steam-methane reforming linke
d to the non-hydrocarbon-based processes). A version of the Aspen Plus
process-simulation computer code, previously enhanced by the author f
or exergy analysis, is used in the analyses. Overall efficiencies are
determined to range widely, from 21 to 86% for energy efficiencies, an
d from 19 to 83% for exergy efficiencies. The losses in all processes
are found to exhibit many common factors. Energy losses associated wit
h emissions account for 100% of the total energy losses, while exergy
losses associated with emissions account for 4-10% of the total exergy
losses. The remaining exergy losses are associated with internal cons
umptions. It is anticipated that the results will prove useful to thos
e involved in the improvement of existing and design of future hydroge
n production processes. Copyright (C) 1996 International Association f
or Hydrogen Energy.