Afd. Cole et al., FIBEROPTIC INTUBATION USING ANESTHETIZED, PARALYZED, APNEIC PATIENTS - RESULTS OF A RESIDENT TRAINING-PROGRAM, Anesthesiology, 84(5), 1996, pp. 1101-1106
Background: There is no consensus about the best way to teach fiberopt
ic intubation. This study assesses the effectiveness of a training pro
gram in which novice anesthetic residents routinely were taught fibero
ptic tracheal intubation of anesthetized, paralyzed, apneic patients.
Methods: Eight inexperienced anesthetic residents learned fiberoptic a
nd conventional tracheal intubation simultaneously during their first
4 months of training, All intubations were performed using general ane
sthesia and muscle paralysis, Of these intubations, 223 (23%) were fib
eroptic and 743 (77%) were laryngoscopic, Subsequently, their intubati
on skills with the two techniques were studied in a prospective, singl
e-blind randomized trial involving 131 elective patients, Intubation t
imes, Sp(O2), ET(CO2), hemodynamic changes on intubation, and complica
tions were recorded for 71 fiberoptic and 57 laryngoscopic intubations
. Results: There were two failures of the rigid and one failure of the
fiberoptic technique due to inability to intubate within 180 s. In ca
ses of failure, the tracheas were intubated successfully after mask ve
ntilation by the alternative technique, No hypoxemia or hypercarbia oc
curred in any patient. There were no differences in hemodynamic indexe
s nor incidence of sore throat or hoarseness between the two groups, M
ean intubation times were 56 +/- 24 s (mean +/- SD) for fiberoptic and
34 +/- 10 s (mean +/- SD) for laryngoscopic (P < 0.001). Conclusions:
Novices taught fiberoptic intubation and rigid laryngoscopic intubati
on under similar conditions, with similar volumes of experience, learn
both techniques well, The safety and effectiveness of this training r
egimen commend it for inclusion in any residency program.