RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF BONE REGENERATION FOLLOWING PERIODONTAL SURGERY WITH OR WITHOUT EXPANDED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE BARRIERS

Citation
P. Eickholz et al., RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF BONE REGENERATION FOLLOWING PERIODONTAL SURGERY WITH OR WITHOUT EXPANDED POLYTETRAFLUOROETHYLENE BARRIERS, Journal of periodontology, 67(4), 1996, pp. 379-385
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine
Journal title
ISSN journal
00223492
Volume
67
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
379 - 385
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3492(1996)67:4<379:REOBRF>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
IN 16 PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED PERIODONTITIS, 23 teeth exhibiting interp roximal intrabony defects were treated by conventional periodontal sur gery (n = 10, control) or guided tissue regeneration (GTR) technique u sing expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) barriers (n = 13, test), respectively. Clinical parameters were assessed before and 6 months a fter surgery. Presurgically and 3 and 6 months postsurgically standard ized bite-wing radiographs were taken. Using a loupe and a computer-as sisted system, respectively, the distances from the cemento-enamel jun ction (CEJ) to alveolar crest (AC) and CEJ to the most apical extensio n of bony defect (ED) were measured. The average gain of attachment wa s assessed 2.33 mm in the control group and 3.17 mm in the test group, The bony fill was measured 0.97 mm and 0.97 mm in the control group a nd 0.93 mm and 1.68 mm in the test group after 3 and 6 months, respect ively, using a loupe. Using a computer-assisted system 0.83 mm and 1.8 2 mm of bone fill could be measured (control) and 0.76 mm and 1.79 mm (test) after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Compared to the gold standa rd of surgical measurements, the computer-assisted analysis of radiogr aphs underestimated bone loss significantly less than evaluation with a loupe (P < 0.002). Compared to conventional periodontal surgery, the GTR technique resulted in higher attachment gain and bony fill. Howev er, the high variation of surgical results in the test group prevented the calculation of a statistically significant difference.