Ar. Tagliaferro et al., CYCLIC FOOD RESTRICTION ALTERS SUBSTRATE UTILIZATION AND ABOLISHES PROTECTION FROM MAMMARY CARCINOGENESIS IN FEMALE RATS, The Journal of nutrition, 126(5), 1996, pp. 1398-1405
We tested the hypothesis that cyclic food restriction abolishes protec
tion against mammary carcinogenesis. Virgin female Sprague Dawley rats
(n = 159) were injected intraperitoneally with 25 mg/kg n-methyl-n-ni
trosourea at 50 d of age. Eleven days later, rats were given free acce
ss to a 24.6 g fat/100 g AIN-76A diet (ad lib-c), fed in two meals (me
-c), or fed in two meals restricted in weight by 33% for 1 wk followed
by 3 wk of compensatory refeeding (me-r) for 18 wk or 4.5 restriction
cycles. Energy and substrate utilization of 15 rats from each group w
as measured by indirect calorimetry. The me-r rats ate and weighed les
s (P < 0.0001), had a greater efficiency of food utilization (P < 0.01
), and had a 12% higher incidence of mammary cancer (P < 0.0001) than
ad lib-c rats after adjusting for the effect of final body weight. Res
ting metabolic rate was not different among groups, but me-r rats used
less glucose during restriction and more glucose and less lipid for e
nergy during body weight recovery than me-c rats (P < 0.0001). Increas
ed energy efficiency and the shift in utilization of glucose and fatty
acids followed closely the effects of cyclic food restriction and mea
l feeding on mammary carcinogenesis.