Rights in American society present a paradox-critics increasingly asse
rt that proliferation of rights is undermining Americans' sense of com
munity, yet scholars continue to document Americans' reluctance to ass
ert formal legal rights. We explore the meaning of rights in American
society by describing the intersection between the evolving civil righ
ts of a previously excluded minority, culminating in the Americans wit
h Disabilities Act of 1990, and the personal histories of two individu
als who might potentially invoke or benefit from such rights. Tracing
the life stories of ''Sara Lane'' and ''Jill Golding'' from childhood
through adolescence to adulthood and employment, we relate the everyda
y relevance or irrelevance of law to important elements of the reconst
ructed past-the development of self-concept and of one's place in rela
tion to the social mainstream. The article, which is part of a larger
project involving a more broadly based interview sample of adults with
disabilities, analyzes life stories to critique familiar assumptions
about the perceived conflict between rights and social relationships a
nd about the mobilization of law. It also offers an innovative approac
h to the study of law and legal consciousness by involving Sara Lane a
nd Jill Golding in the analysis of successive drafts and by including
their reactions to what the authors have written.