Jp. Buchet et al., GEOGRAPHICAL AND TEMPORAL DIFFERENCES IN THE URINARY-EXCRETION OF INORGANIC ARSENIC - A BELGIAN POPULATION STUDY, Occupational and environmental medicine, 53(5), 1996, pp. 320-327
Objective-This Belgian study assessed the geographical and temporal di
fferences in the exposure of the population to inorganic arsenic, a kn
own carcinogen. Methods-In the CadmiBel study (1985-9) the 24 h urinar
y arsenic excretion was measured, as an index of recent exposure, in i
ndustrialised cities (Liege: n = 664, Charleroi: n = 291), in a rural
control area (Hechtel-Eksel: n = 397), and in rural districts in which
the population had possibly been exposed through the drinking water o
r the emissions of nonferrous smelters (Wezel: n = 93, Lommel: n = 111
, and Pelt: n = 133). In the PheeCad study, in 1991-5, the rural areas
(n = 609) were re-examined together with an urban control area (Leuve
n: n = 152). Results-The CadmiBel results showed that after adjustment
for sex, age, and body mass index, the 24 h arsenic excretion was on
average low in Liege (91 nmol), Charleroi (155 nmol), Hechtel-Eksel (1
44 nmol), and Wezel (158 nmol), whereas the highest excretions were fo
und in Lommel (570 nmol) and Pelt (373 nmol). During the PheeCad study
, the mean 24 h arsenic excretion in the rural areas ranged from 81 to
111 nmol. This was lower than six years earlier and similar to the ex
cretion in the control town (108 nmol). Longitudinal studies in 529 pe
ople Living in the rural areas confirmed that their 24 h arsenic excre
tion had decreased (P<0.001) from 222 to 100 nmol. As well as the drin
king water, industry was likely to be a source of the increased exposu
re in Lommel and Pelt in 1985-9, because at that time the urinary arse
nic excretion did not follow the regional differences in the arsenic c
ontent of the drinking water, because the fall in the arsenic excretio
n over time coincided with the implementation by industry of stricter
environmental regulations, because in individual subjects the urinary
arsenic excretion was inversely correlated with the distance to the ne
arest smelter, and because an increased arsenic excretion was only fou
nd downwind from the main smelter. The official network that monitors
the arsenic concentration in airborne and fall out dust did not detect
the high exposure in Lommel and Pelt between 1985 and 1989. Conclusio
n-This study highlights the necessity to validate environmental monito
ring programmes by directly estimating the internal exposure of the po
pulation.