VESTIBULAR NEURECTOMY - RETROSIGMOID-INTRACANALICULAR VERSUS RETROLABYRINTHINE APPROACH

Citation
Mj. Mckenna et al., VESTIBULAR NEURECTOMY - RETROSIGMOID-INTRACANALICULAR VERSUS RETROLABYRINTHINE APPROACH, The American journal of otology, 17(2), 1996, pp. 253-258
Citations number
24
Categorie Soggetti
Otorhinolaryngology
ISSN journal
01929763
Volume
17
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
253 - 258
Database
ISI
SICI code
0192-9763(1996)17:2<253:VN-RVR>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
Selective vestibular neurectomy is an effective treatment for intracta ble vertigo of peripheral vestibular origin when preservation of heari ng is a goal. The retrolabyrinthine and retrosigmoid-intracanalicular approaches have been used predominantly at our institutions over the l ast 10 years. The results and complications of these two techniques we re compared. No significant differences were found between hearing res ults in these two patient groups. The retrosigmoid-internal auditory c anal approach yielded better control of recurrent episodic vertigo, as well as superior ablation of postoperative ice-water caloric response s (p < 0.05). Surgical complications, including the incidence of cereb rospinal fluid leakage (greater in retrolabyrinthine approach) and pos toperative headache (more prevalent in retrosigmoid approach), were al so analyzed. To further evaluate the results of this study, data were reanalyzed and compared with previously published reports of selective vestibular nerve section.