CHARACTER DISCRIMINATORY POWER, CHARACTER-SET CONGRUENCE, AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS FROM HYBRID ZONES - AN EXAMPLE USING STONE CRABS (MENIPPE)
Tm. Bert et al., CHARACTER DISCRIMINATORY POWER, CHARACTER-SET CONGRUENCE, AND THE CLASSIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS FROM HYBRID ZONES - AN EXAMPLE USING STONE CRABS (MENIPPE), Evolution, 50(2), 1996, pp. 655-671
Many investigators categorize individuals from hybrid zones to facilit
ate comparisons among genotypic classes (e.g., parental, F-1, backcros
s) for comparative studies in which components of fitness or geographi
c variation are being analyzed. Frequently, multiple character sets re
presenting genetically independent traits are used to classify these i
ndividuals and various methodologies are employed to combine the class
ifications obtained from the different character sets. We adapted the
principles of total evidence and taxonomic congruence (two formalized
approaches used by systematists in formulating phylogenetic hypotheses
) to address the problem of discriminating hybridizing species and cla
ssifying individuals from hybrid zones. As our model, we used two morp
hological (coloration and morphometric) and two molecular (allozyme an
d mitochondrial DNA restriction-fragment-length polymorphism) characte
r sets that differentiate two stone crab species (Menippe adina and M.
mercenaria). Using principal-components analysis, we determined that
combining character sets and eliminating characters or character sets
that did not have large eigenvector coefficients for the principal com
ponent that best separated the two species yielded the highest level o
f discrimination between species and allowed us to classify a broad ra
nge of morpho-genotypes as hybrids. For the stone crabs, three diagnos
tic allozyme loci and five diagnostic coloration characters best separ
ated the species. The two character sets were not completely congruent
, but they agreed in their classification of 50% of the individuals fr
om the hybrid zone and rarely strongly disagreed in their classificati
ons. Classification discrepancies between the two character sets proba
bly represent variation between traits in interspecific gene flow rath
er than intraspecific, ecologically mediated variation. Our results su
pport the assertions of previous investigators who espoused the benefi
ts associated with using multiple character sets to classify individua
ls from hybrid zones and demonstrate that, if character sets are reaso
nably congruent and numerically balanced, combining diagnostic charact
ers from multiple character sets (a total-evidence approach) can enhan
ce discriminatory power between species and facilitate the assignment
of hybrid-zone individuals to genotypic classes. On the contrary, clas
sifying hybrid-zone individuals using character sets separately (a tax
onomic-congruence approach) provides the opportunity to compare levels
of introgression between species and to assess reasons for discordanc
e among the data sets.