Jd. Trobe et al., CONTRAST SENSITIVITY AND OTHER VISION TESTS IN THE OPTIC NEURITIS TREATMENT TRIAL, American journal of ophthalmology, 121(5), 1996, pp. 547-553
PURPOSE: To determine the intercorrelation, prevalence of abnormality,
and incremental detection value of vision tests in optic neuritis. ME
THODS: We calculated the linear correlation of paired vision tests and
prevalence of abnormal test values from baseline and six-month measur
ements of Snellen visual acuity, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity, Hu
mphrey Field Analyzer mean deviation, and Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue c
olor vision in 438 patients entered in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Tr
ial from 1988 to 1991. The incremental detection value of nonvisual ac
uity tests was defined as their frequency of abnormality when visual a
cuity was 20/20 or better. RESULTS: All four vision-test results were
highly intercorrelated at baseline and at six months, At baseline, con
trast: sensitivity had the highest prevalence of abnormality, but all
vision rests were so often abnormal that differences were not clinical
ly relevant, At six months, when visual recovery had occurred, contras
t sensitivity was most often abnormal (2.2 x visual acuity; 1.8 x mean
deviation; 1.5 x Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue color vision test); when
contrast sensitivity, mean deviation, or Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue co
lor vision was normal, visual acuity was 20/25 or better in 98% of pat
ients. CONCLUSIONS: The high intercorrelation of four vision tests sug
gests that optic neuritis affects a broad range of visual functions, A
mong nonvisual acuity tests, Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity proved
to be a particularly practical and sensitive indicator of visual dysfu
nction in optic neuritis.