SCHOLARSHIP RECONSIDERED - CONSIDERATIONS FOR A MORE INCLUSIVE SCHOLARSHIP IN THE ACADEMY

Citation
Jr. Chepyatorthomson et Se. King, SCHOLARSHIP RECONSIDERED - CONSIDERATIONS FOR A MORE INCLUSIVE SCHOLARSHIP IN THE ACADEMY, Quest, 48(2), 1996, pp. 165-174
Citations number
26
Categorie Soggetti
Education & Educational Research
Journal title
QuestACNP
ISSN journal
00336297
Volume
48
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
165 - 174
Database
ISI
SICI code
0033-6297(1996)48:2<165:SR-CFA>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
The current scholarship model in higher education has been conceived, produced, and reproduced in the image of the dominant culture. The val ues, behaviors, and expectations for the academy have been forged by a university culture that is ''relatively homogeneous by race, ethnicit y, and gender.'' Although ethnic racial minorities are outnumbered by both white females and males, white males, by virtue of their numbers in rank and other positions of power, are the dominant members of the academic community. Individuals whose characteristics differ from thos e of the dominant group members are less likely to receive recognition , sponsorship, favorable procedural evaluation, or positive commentary on their scholarship. The purpose of this paper is to discuss conside rations for a more inclusive scholarship in the academy.