This paper makes the assumption that organ transplantation is, under s
ome conditions at least, a proper use of communal medical resources. P
roceeding from this assumption, the author: (1) sketches the history o
f the problem; (2) briefly examines the prevalent models of communal s
tructure and offers an alternate version; (3) discusses notions of jus
tice and obligation derived from these different models; (4) applies t
hese to the practice of harvesting organs for transplantation; and the
n (5) offers a different process for harvesting organs from the newly
dead. If community is viewed as united by a set of shred goals and com
mon values among which the value of community itself is important, the
n certain reciprocal obligations among members obtain. I suggest that
routine salvage of organs from the newly dead be instituted but that i
t be routine salvage ''with a twist'': rather early in life all member
s of the community are given the opportunity to refuse but their refus
al carries the reciprocal condition that they cannot later become the
recipients of that which they refuse to others.