This study is intended to determine the spatially varying optimal time
periods for calculating seasonal climate normals over the entire Unit
ed States based on temperature data at 344 United States climate divis
ions during the period of 1931-1993. This is done by verifying the sea
sonal climate normals as a forecast for the same season next year. The
forecast skill is measured by the correlation between the predicted a
nd observed anomalies relative to the 30-yr normal. The optimal time p
eriods are chosen to produce the highest correlation between the forec
asts and the observation. The results indicate that generally (all sea
sons and all locations) annually updated climate normals averaged over
shorter than 30-yr periods are better than the WMO specified 30-yr no
rmal (updated only every 10 years), in terms of the skill in predictin
g the upcoming year. The spatial pattern of the optimal averaging time
periods changes with season. The skill of optimal normals comes from
both the annual updating and the shorter averaging time periods of the
se normals. Using optimal climate normals turns out to be a reasonably
successful forecast method. Utility is further enhanced by realizing
that the lead time of this forecast is almost one year. Forecasts at l
eads beyond one year (skipping a year) are also reasonably skillful. T
he skill obtained from the dependent verification is lowered to take a
ccount of the degradation expected on independent data. In practice th
e optimal climate normals with a variable averaging period were found
to be somewhat problematic. The problems had to do primarily with the
temporal continuity and spatial consistency of the forecasts. For the
time being, a constant time period of 10 years is used in the operatio
nal seasonal temperature forecasts for all seasons and locations.