NUCLEASE SENSITIVITY OF THE HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE-CHORIONIC SOMATOMAMMOTROPIN LOCUS IN PITUITARY AND PLACENTA SUGGEST DIFFERENT MECHANISMS FOR TISSUE-SPECIFIC REGULATION
Be. Nickel et Pa. Cattini, NUCLEASE SENSITIVITY OF THE HUMAN GROWTH HORMONE-CHORIONIC SOMATOMAMMOTROPIN LOCUS IN PITUITARY AND PLACENTA SUGGEST DIFFERENT MECHANISMS FOR TISSUE-SPECIFIC REGULATION, Molecular and cellular endocrinology, 118(1-2), 1996, pp. 155-162
The five human growth hormone (GH) and chorionic somatomammotropin (CS
) genes are located at a single locus on chromosome 17. These genes sh
are extensive nucleotide sequence similarity (similar to 94%) even in
their flanking DNA, yet GH-N is expressed efficiently in the pituitary
under the control of the pituitary-specific factor GHF-1/Pit-1 and th
e remaining CS-A, CS-B, CS-L and GH-V genes are transcriptionally acti
ve in the placenta. Despite this specificity in vivo, a truncated CS-A
promoter can bind GHF-1/Pit-1 and allow CS-A promoter activity in pit
uitary cells ill vitro, With a view to assessing whether the placental
genes of the GH/CS locus possess a different chromatin structure in t
he pituitary and are, thus, less transcriptionally active than the GH-
N gene, we have compared the DNAase I sensitivity of GH/CS in isolated
pituitary and placenta cell nuclei. Our data indicate that these gene
s are equally sensitive in isolated human pituitary nuclei. By contras
t, the CS-A? CS-B and CS-L genes were significantly (P < 0.05) more se
nsitive than the GH-N gene in isolated human placenta nuclei. Although
just not significant, the GH-V gene was slightly more sensitive than
the GH-N gene. This pattern was also seen with nuclei from human chori
ocarcinoma BeWo and JEG-3 cells, which express low and extremely low l
evels of CS RNA, respectively, but was distinct from the pattern obser
ved in the non placental human cervical carcinoma HeLa cell line. Thes
e data indicate that the inactivity of the CS genes in the pituitary d
oes not correlate with a 'closed' chromatin structure. However, they a
re consistent with ii role for a more 'open' chromatin conformation in
placenta-specific expression, but not necessarily high levels of tran
scriptional activity.