C. Renolleau et al., ISOLATED AXILLARY RECURRENCES AFTER CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF BREAST-CANCER, European journal of cancer, 32A(4), 1996, pp. 617-621
This retrospective study presents the diagnostic, prognostic and thera
peutic problems raised by axillary recurrences (AR). 1589 cases of bre
ast cancer measuring less than 3 cm, treated at the Institut Curie bet
ween 1981 and 1987, were studied by a combination of surgery and radio
therapy. Treatment of the breast always included wide local excision a
ssociated with irradiation. The axilla was treated either by dissectio
n (865 cases) or by irradiation (724 cases) and 159 patients received
chemotherapy. 26 patients (2%) developed AR, confirmed by fine needle
aspiration cytology in 92% of cases. None of these 26 patients had ini
tially received chemotherapy. The treatment of the AR was variable, ad
apted to the initial treatment. 22 patients retained their breast duri
ng treatment of the AR and none subsequently developed a local recurre
nce. 4 mastectomies were performed and histological examination reveal
ed a subclinical local recurrence in 2 cases. The TNM classification,
menopausal status, size of the tumour and hormonal receptor status wer
e not risk factors for AR. Young age (P = 0.01) and high histological
grade (P = 0.03) were Significant risk factors for AR. The AR rate was
similar whether axillary dissection or axillary irradiation had been
performed. The overall 5-year survival after initial treatment was 85%
for AR and 95% for the reference population. The overall 4-year survi
val after recurrence was 69% and the incidence of metastasis was marke
dly increased (P = 0.002). 2 of the 26 patients developed lymphoedema
of the arm after treatment of AR. We confirm that AR worsens the progn
osis, but not significantly more than local recurrence. Young age and
the modified histological grading of Scarff Bloom and Richardson were
risk factors for AR. Although excision of the AR is necessary to ensur
e local control, mastectomy is unnecessary when clinical examination a
nd mammography are normal. (C) 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd