PHASE-I TRIAL OF ETOPOSIDE, DOXORUBICIN AND CISPLATIN (EAP) IN COMBINATION WITH GM-CSF

Citation
Pa. Ford et al., PHASE-I TRIAL OF ETOPOSIDE, DOXORUBICIN AND CISPLATIN (EAP) IN COMBINATION WITH GM-CSF, European journal of cancer, 32A(4), 1996, pp. 631-635
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
ISSN journal
09598049
Volume
32A
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
631 - 635
Database
ISI
SICI code
0959-8049(1996)32A:4<631:PTOEDA>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
The aim of this study was to ameliorate the toxicity of the etoposide, doxorubicin and cisplatin (EAP) regimen and to investigate the feasib ility of dose escalation, using the molgramostim form of granulocyte m acrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) 10 mu g/kg/day s.c. into the regimen. The design of the trial allowed for amended scheduling of the agents in the event of suboptimal results. Initially the regimen comprised etoposide 120 mg/m(2), days 1-3, doxorubicin 40 mg/m(2), day 1, and cisplatin 40 mg/m(2), days 2 and 8. GM-CSF was begun on day 4 and continued until recovery of granulocyte counts. Courses were repea ted every 21 days. 3 patients were treated at these doses. 5 patients received escalated doses (etoposide 180 mg/m(2); doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2 ) cisplatin 60 mg/m(2)) on this schedule; 4 out of 5 had intolerable m yelosuppression (grade IV neutropenia or thrombocytopenia lasting grea ter than or equal to 7 days). These results prompted the administratio n of the day 8 cisplatin dose on day 3, with GM-CSF beginning on day 4 . At the lowest doses of each agent (etoposide 120-doxorubicin 40-cisp latin 40), 3 of 6 patients had intolerable myelosuppression, and 3 pat ients had febrile neutropenia. Dose escalation of all of the drugs to etoposide 180 mg/m(2), doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2), cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) re sulted in documented infections in 4 out of 4 patients. GM-CSF toxicit y included rash, dyspnoea, arrhythmias and pericardial effusions. The conclusion was that the use of GM-CSF does not permit escalation of dr ug doses on either schedule of EAP administration, and that these resu lts do not support the combined use of GM-CSF and EAP. (C) 1996 Elsevi er Science Ltd