Debate in the media over global warming often mixes what is well known
with what is speculative, thereby leading to an artificially confusin
g impression that scientists share no consensus of the probable magnit
ude, timing, and potential seriousness of the environmental and societ
al consequences of the documented and well-understood buildup of vario
us greenhouse-enhancing gases in the atmosphere. Indeed, widespread co
ncern exists over the plausibility of temperature increases of 1 to 5-
degrees-C in the 21 st century, and that the mid to upper part of that
range could imply dramatic restructuring of ecosystems or communities
. I discuss the difficulty in interpreting the 0.5 +/- 0.2-degrees-C 2
0th century warming trend as ''proof'' of greenhouse-gas-induced globa
l warming in light of possible climatic-change causal factors such as
industrial aerosols, natural fluctuations, or changes in solar output.
How to act is controversial, and economic model results showing poten
tial abatement costs of carbon taxes are discussed