Bp. Pickett et al., WOUND-HEALING - TENSILE-STRENGTH VS HEALING TIME FOR WOUNDS CLOSED UNDER TENSION, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 122(5), 1996, pp. 565-569
Objectives: To measure tensile strength of wounds closed with and with
out tension in rats, delineating the postoperative time interval when
tensile strength is equal. To study patterns of growth in tensile stre
ngth. Design: Transverse incisions on the backs of control rats were c
losed with minimal tension. In experimental animals, after excision of
skin from the back, wounds were closed with closing tensions in exces
s of 70 g. Animals were killed at designated healing intervals for ten
sile-strength testing of wounds. Subjects: One hundred Sprague-Dawley
rats were divided into 5 groups, days 5, 7, 10, 14, and 21, with equal
numbers of control and experimental animals in each group. Wounds fro
m 94 animals were available for break-load testing. Intervention: Clos
ing tensions were measured for transverse incisions on the backs of co
ntrol animals before closure and after removal of 50 to 60 mm of skin
from the backs of experimental animals. Results: Tensile strength was
not significantly different on day 5. However, wounds closed under ten
sion showed significantly higher tensile strength on days 7, 10: 14, a
nd 21. Polynomial regression suggests a cubic relationship between hea
ling time and tensile strength. Conclusions: Results suggest that tens
ile strength of wounds closed under tension exceeds that of tensionles
s wounds as early as day 7 following surgery. This study also illustra
tes the 2 periods of rapid increase in wound tensile strength that pro
bably coincide with specific stages of wound healing.