LUMBAR CATHETERIZATION OF THE SPINAL SUBARACHNOID SPACE IN THE RAT

Citation
Rv. Storkson et al., LUMBAR CATHETERIZATION OF THE SPINAL SUBARACHNOID SPACE IN THE RAT, Journal of neuroscience methods, 65(2), 1996, pp. 167-172
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Neurosciences
ISSN journal
01650270
Volume
65
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
167 - 172
Database
ISI
SICI code
0165-0270(1996)65:2<167:LCOTSS>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
The method commonly used for catheterization of the lumbar subarachnoi d space in the rat implies inserting the catheter through the atlanto- occipital (A-O) membrane and moving the catheter caudally along the sp inal cord. The method is associated with a considerable morbidity. A m ethod for direct catheterization of the lumbar subarachnoid space was therefore developed. Major surgery was avoided by using a catheter-thr ough-needle technique. Of 32 rats, none died. There were no signs of n eurological disturbances, and all animals gained weight as normal the first week after implantation. Data from rats catheterized by the A-O method were used for comparison. Of 40 animals, 2 died, 11 showed sign s of neurological disturbances, and the mean weight was reduced during the first week after catheterization. The two groups of animals showe d different behavioural responses to intrathecal injection of N-methyl -D-aspartate (NMDA, 0.1-1.6 mM, 15 mu l) which is thought to stimulate afferent pathways mediating nociception. Animals with a lumbar cathet er showed licking, biting and scratching behaviour in a dose-related m anner for concentrations up to 1.6 mM. The animals with A-O catheters showed a maximum level of this behaviour already at 0.4 mM, while 0.5 mM induced convulsions. A possible explanation of this difference in r esponse to NMDA could be a long-lasting pain state in the A-O group, c aused by catheter-induced changes in the spinal cord and by the extens ive surgery. It is concluded that the direct lumbar catheterization ha s several advantages compared to the A-O method, decreasing the suffer ing of the animals, the neurological disturbances and the interference with nociceptive functions of the spinal cord.