EFFECTS OF NON-REM SLEEP ON THE RESPONSE OF RESPIRATORY OUTPUT TO VARYING INSPIRATORY FLOW

Citation
D. Georgopoulos et al., EFFECTS OF NON-REM SLEEP ON THE RESPONSE OF RESPIRATORY OUTPUT TO VARYING INSPIRATORY FLOW, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 153(5), 1996, pp. 1624-1630
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
ISSN journal
1073449X
Volume
153
Issue
5
Year of publication
1996
Pages
1624 - 1630
Database
ISI
SICI code
1073-449X(1996)153:5<1624:EONSOT>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
It has been shown in mechanically ventilated awake normal humans that increasing inspiratory flow rate (VI) exerts an excitatory effect on r espiratory output. It is not known if this effect persists during slee p. To test this, seven normal adults were studied during wakefulness a nd non-rapid eye movement (non-REM) sleep. Subjects were connected thr ough a nose mask to a volume-cycled ventilator in the assist/control m ode, and VI was increased in steps (3 to 4 breaths each) from 30 to 70 L/min and then back to 30 L/min. VI pattern was square, and all breat hs were subject-triggered. Forty-one trials during non-REM sleep and 1 0 during wakefulness were analyzed. Both during sleep and wakefulness minute ventilation increased and total breath duration (Ttot) decrease d significantly in a graded and reversible manner as VI increased. The se changes were complete in the first breath after VI transition. The response was significantly less during sleep than during wakefulness ( p < 0.05); at 30 L/min Ttot, expressed as percent of that at 70 L/min, was 110.2+/-1.3% during sleep and 127.8+/-3.9% during wakefulness. Du ring wakefulness, the rate of change in airway pressure before trigger ing the ventilator (dp/dt), an index of respiratory drive, increased s ignificantly (p < 0.05) with increasing VI. During sleep dp/dt was not affected by VI changes. In four sleeping subjects the increase in VI was sustained for 1.5 to 2 min. There was no evidence for adaptation o f the response; Ttot, averaged over the last three breaths, did not di ffer from that obtained when VI was sustained for only 3 to 4 breaths. We concluded that VI exerts an excitatory effect on respiratory outpu t, mediated by a reflex neural mechanism, and the gain of this reflex is attenuated by sleep.