F. Lucas et A. Sclafani, CAPSAICIN ATTENUATES FEEDING SUPPRESSION BUT NOT REINFORCEMENT BY INTESTINAL NUTRIENTS, American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology, 39(5), 1996, pp. 1059-1064
During and after a meal, the presence of nutrients in the intestine ca
n be rapidly detected and signaled to the brain via visceral afferents
. Intestinal infusions of carbohydrate and fat suppress food intake, a
nd this satiety action is inhibited by capsaicin, a neurotoxin that pr
oduces a partial visceral deafferentation. This study determined if th
e postingestive reinforcing action of nutrients is also suppressed by
capsaicin treatment. Food-restricted control and capsaicin-treated rat
s were trained to drink a flavored solution paired with intraduodenal
infusions of carbohydrate (Polycose solution) on some days and, on oth
er days, a differently flavored solution paired with intraduodenal wat
er infusions. In a choice test, both groups displayed a strong prefere
nce for the Polycose-paired flavor. In a subsequent satiety test, howe
ver, intraduodenal Polycose suppressed sucrose sham feeding in the con
trols but not in capsaicin-treated rats. The same rats were next train
ed to associate new flavors with intraduodenal fat (corn oil emulsion)
and intraduodenal water infusions. During training, oil infusions red
uced oral intakes in the controls much more than in the capsaicin-trea
ted rats. Both groups reliably preferred the oil-paired flavor in the
subsequent choice test. These results indicate that, unlike the satiat
ing effect of intestinal carbohydrate and fat, the reinforcing actions
of these nutrients are not mediated by capsaicin-sensitive visceral a
fferents. The data also imply that the postingestive reinforcement pro
duced by nutrients is not dependent on the nutrients' satiating qualit
y.