Despite renewed vigor in the social comparison literature, little atte
ntion has been paid to methods of studying social comparison. This art
icle examines frequently used measures and procedures in social compar
ison research. The question of whether a method truly captures social
comparison requires a clear understanding of what social comparison is
; hence a definition of social comparison is proposed, multiple ancill
ary processes in social comparison are identified, and definitional co
ntroversies are addressed. Then, methods are examined for how strongly
they imply social comparison and for whether they capture social comp
arisons as they would occur naturally. It is argued that some methods
may not truly capture social comparison, that some methods may be too
vulnerable to alternative interpretations to be useful, and that some
methods may paint an inaccurate picture of social comparison.