Gjmg. Vanderheijden et al., STEROID INJECTIONS FOR SHOULDER DISORDERS - A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIALS, British journal of general practice, 46(406), 1996, pp. 309-316
Background. Patients with shoulder disorders are believed to benefit c
onsiderably from steroid injections. However, the controversy about th
eir efficacy persists. Aim. The study was designed to assess the effic
acy of steroid injections for shoulder disorders. Method. A systematic
computerized literature search in Medline (Index Medicos 1/1966-10/19
95) and Embase (Excerpta Medica 1/1984-10/1995) was conducted, supplem
ented with citation tracking of all relevant publications. Studies pub
lished before November 1995 were selected if steroid injections were r
andomly allocated to patients with shoulder disorders and when clinica
lly relevant outcome measures were reported. Because the validity of s
tudy outcomes depends heavily on the strength of methodological qualit
y, the methods were assessed systematically by two 'blinded' independe
nt reviewers. This resulted in a method score (maximum 100 points) tha
t was based on four categories: study population, interventions, measu
rement of effect, and data presentation and analysis. Confidence inter
vals for the differences between groups in success rates were calculat
ed in order to summarize the efficacy of steroid injections. Results.
Only three out of the 16 studies scored more than 50 points, indicatin
g a generally poor quality of methods. Most studies reported small sam
ple sizes. The flaws most often found were incomparability of co-inter
ventions and poor blinding of therapist. The methods assessment was fr
equently hampered by incomplete information about randomization, progn
ostic comparability, compliance, outcome measures included, blinding o
f patients and blinding of outcome measurement. Conclusions. The evide
nce in favour of the efficacy of steroid injections for shoulder disor
ders is scarce. The methods of most studies appear to be of poor quali
ty. The few studies that appear to be credible do not provide conclusi
ve evidence about which patients at what time in the course of shoulde
r disorders benefit most from steroid injections.