Crop growth simulation models have been used to predict the consequenc
es of climate change for cereal growth and yield (Adams et al., 1990).
Two significant uncertainties in impact assessments result from the u
se of possible future climate scenarios as inputs to crop models. Firs
t, although based on the same physical principles, General Circulation
Models (GCMs) provide individual estimates of the global climate and
thus GCMs predict a variety of expected climate changes. We question t
he rationale of formulating average or 'composite' climate change scen
arios when used in combination with the many non-linear responses of c
rops to their environment. Secondly, uncertainty also arises from the
way in which weather scenarios are constructed from GCMs. Future clima
tic scenarios, derived from GCMs, have described changes in mean weath
er (Kenny, Harrison & Parry, 1993) but non-linear crop models require
explicit incorporation of changes in climatic variability to assess th
e risks to agricultural production from climate change. Accordingly, w
e coupled a wheat crop simulation model (AFRCWHEAT2) with a stochastic
weather generator (LARS-WG) and report that modelled changes in tempe
rature variability may have more profound effect on simulated grain yi
eld than changes in its mean value.