C. Spix et He. Wichmann, DAILY MORTALITY AND AIR-POLLUTANTS - FINDINGS FROM KOLN, GERMANY, Journal of epidemiology and community health, 50, 1996, pp. 52-58
Study objective and design - For the APHEA study, the short term effec
ts of air pollutants on human health were investigated in a comparable
way in various European cities. Daily mortality was used as one of th
e health effects indicators. This report aims to demonstrate the steps
in epidemiological model building in this type of time series analysi
s aimed at detecting short term effects under a poisson distribution a
ssumption and shows the tools for decision making. In addition, it ass
esses the impact of these steps on the pollution effect estimates. Set
ting - Koln, Germany, is a city of one million inhabitants. It is dens
ely populated with a warm, humid, unfavourable climate and a high traf
fic density. In previous studies, smog episodes were found to increase
mortality and higher sulphur dioxide (SO2) levels were connected with
increases in the number of episodes of croup. Participants, materials
and methods Daily total mortality was obtained for 1975-85. SO2, tota
l suspended particulates, and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) data were availab
le from two to five stations for the city area, and size fractionated
PM(7) data from a neighbouring city. The main tools were time series p
lots of the raw data, predicted and residual data, the partial autocor
relation function and periodogram of the residuals, cross correlations
of prefiltered series, plots of categorised influences, chi(2) statis
tics of influences and sensitivity analyses taking overdispersion and
autocorrelation into account. Results and conclusions - With regard to
model building, it is concluded that seasonal and epidemic correction
are the most important steps. The actual model chosen depends very mu
ch on the properties of the data set. For the pollution effect estimat
es, trend, season, and epidemic corrections are important to avoid ove
restimation of the effect, while an appropriate short term meteorology
influence correction model may actually prevent underestimation. When
the model leaves very little overdispersion and autocorrelation in th
e residuals, which indicates a good fit, correction for them has conse
quently little impact. Given the model, most of the range of SO2 value
s (5th centile to 95th centile) led to a 3-4% increase in mortality (s
ignificant), particulates led to a 2% increase (borderline significant
, less data than for SO2), and NO2 had no relationship with mortality
(measurements possibly not representative of actual exposure). Effects
were usually delayed by a day.