Fm. Perez et Wc. Banta, HOW DOES CELLARIA GET OUT OF ITS BOX - A NEW CHEILOSTOME HYDROSTATIC MECHANISM (BRYOZOA, CHEILOSTOMATA), Invertebrate biology., 115(2), 1996, pp. 162-169
Accepted explanations cannot explain lophophore protrusion in Cellaria
diffusa and C. bassleri, whose apertural structure differs markedly f
rom that of most other cheilostomes. The sclerotized portion of the op
erculum is overlain by a hypostegal coelom. Typical parietal muscles a
re lacking. Lophophore protrusion is accomplished by muscular contract
ion: opercular divaricators cause the operculum to pivot on proximally
located hinge teeth (cardelles) and simultaneously pull down on a pai
r of longitudinal cuticular ridges (depressor bars) on the epitheca. T
he resulting depression of the epitheca causes fluid to pass from the
hypostegal coelom to the perigastric cavity around the proximolateral
edges of the operculum. Both species possess well-developed setigerous
collars, so the location of the vestibule can be definitely establish
ed. The vestibular roof is not involved in operculum formation. The op
erculum appears not to have been derived from the operculum of simple
cheilostomes such as Membranipora, but rather from a cuticular extensi
on of the cryptocyst. The apparent homology of the divaricators to ope
siular muscles suggests derivation from cheilostome ancestors with ext
ensive cryptocysts and opesiules. Apertural morphologies are seldom st
udied in adequate detail, so it is unclear how many cheilostomes share
this mechanism or if Cellaria-like ancestors gave rise to any ascopho
ran cheilostomes.