These experiments were performed to determine why rabbit complement ly
ses tumor cells very efficiently, while not having particularly strong
activity in hemolytic assays or in any other complement assay. The ta
rget cells used were human tumor cells coated with three different mou
se IgG(2a) monoclonal antibodies, and complement from 5 mammalian spec
ies were tested. In antibody titration experiments, rabbit complement
was found to lyse target cells at a relatively low antibody concentrat
ion, insufficient to allow lysis by complement of other species. Since
this result was still observed after absorption of rabbit serum with
target cells, the potency of rabbit complement cannot be attributed to
the presence of natural antibodies. We then assayed C3 deposition on
target cells, using two types of I-125-labeled anti-C3 Abs to measure
C3 deposition: goat antibodies specific for C3 of the human, guinea pi
g, rabbit, rat or mouse, and chicken antibodies to human C3 which cros
s-react with C3 of other mammals. Unexpectedly, complement of the huma
n, rat, guinea pig, and BUB mouse deposited large amounts of C3 on the
surface of target cells, while rabbit complement deposited 100-1,000
fold less. We discuss the possible reasons that C3 deposition does not
correlate with cytotoxicity, and may indeed be inversely related. The
se data indicate that there is a fundamental difference in the complem
ent cascade between rabbits and the other species tested. The potent l
ytic activity of rabbit complement is likely to be related to this dif
ference, although the mechanism is not yet understood.